Colorado Governor Jared Polis has signed Senate Bill 26-131 into law, imposing a series of consumer protection restrictions on sports betting operators in the state.
The law prohibits operators from accepting credit card deposits for sports wagers – a violation classified as a class 2 misdemeanor. The Colorado Limited Gaming Control Commission is empowered to levy civil penalties of up to $25,000 per violation against operators that breach the credit card ban or other provisions of the statute.
Bettors are capped at 6 transactions in any 24-hour period. Operators are also barred from sending push notifications urging users to place bets or add funds to their accounts.
SB 26-131 extends beyond those headline measures. The law introduces tighter advertising standards, including restrictions on the use of terms such as “bonus bet” and “no sweat” in marketing and affiliate campaigns. Advertising between 8 a.m. and 10 p.m. and during live sports broadcasts faces additional constraints. Operators must also submit annual data on deposit behaviour to regulators, with the Division of Gaming required to publish a public report every three years beginning January 1, 2029.
The law is expected to take effect in August 2026. The Colorado Division of Gaming and the Limited Gaming Control Commission will need to issue implementing rules and compliance guidance – including how transaction counts are tracked across operators – ahead of that date.
Colorado voters approved legal sports betting via Proposition DD in November 2019, with the market launching in May 2020 under a framework focused primarily on tax and basic consumer protections. SB 26-131 passed the state Senate 20-14 before clearing the House with amendments in May 2026. The bill’s passage makes Colorado one of the most restrictive regulated sports betting markets in the US – a sharp contrast to states still advancing initial frameworks, such as those covered in Missouri’s recent licensing rollout.

Five of Colorado’s 13 licensed online sportsbooks had already voluntarily blocked credit card deposits before the law was enacted, meaning the statutory ban will primarily force compliance from the remaining operators. Trade observers have warned that the hard daily transaction cap in particular could drive high-value customers toward unregulated offshore alternatives.
Gambling harm advocates have characterised the measures as necessary friction in a market that had normalised continuous wagering. Industry voices have pushed back on the transaction cap and marketing curbs as commercially punitive.
Market watchers are now looking at whether the daily deposit cap and credit card ban become a template for other states advancing their own responsible gambling frameworks.